2 articles
Injuries represent a major public health issue, causing approximately 16,000 deaths globally each day (10% of all deaths), which is 32% more than the combined total caused by malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS. Over the past 15 years, the WHO and regional initiatives have supported the piloting of trauma registries in low- and middle-income countries as essential tools for monitoring, planning, and prevention.
Objective
This article aims to assess the feasibility and utility of implementing a national trauma registry in the Republic of Moldova, in order to improve injury surveillance and emergency service planning.
In 2018, the pilot iCREATE trauma registry was tested for the first time in three countries: Moldova, Armenia, and Georgia. The data collection instrument was developed based on WHO recommendations, ICD-10, and IDB-JAMIE standards under the guidance of partners from the University of Iowa and Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca. All trauma cases from the Institute of Emergency Medicine and the Valentin Ignatenco Municipal Clinical Children’s Hospital in Chișinău were included in the registry.
The analyzed sample consists of 7,942 individuals, predominantly male (57.3%). The most represented age groups were 19-29 years (17.8%) and 30-39 years (17.6%), while individuals aged 70 and above accounted for 11% of the total. Most incidents occurred in urban areas (76.9%). Of the total patients, 52.4% were treated and discharged, while 37.5% required hospitalization. Injuries occurred primarily at home (55.4%) and on public roads (24.7%). The leading mechanism of injury was falls (68.2%), followed by other causes (12.2%) and cut/pierce injuries (10.0%). The most frequently affected body regions were the head/skull (12.5%) and knee (11.8%), followed by the hip (6.7%) and wrist (6.4%). Fractures were the most common injury type (34.5%), followed by contusions (23.0%) and open wounds (14.7%). Several gaps in data collection and reporting were identified and should be considered in future efforts to enhance trauma surveillance.
The data highlight the need to develop a national trauma registry as an essential tool for monitoring, prevention, and effective intervention, alongside health promotion campaigns targeting vulnerable groups and the involvement of relevant stakeholders.
There were no data on in-hospital stroke care indicators until Moldova's accession to the international Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q) platform in 2016. The aim of this paper was to assess the acute stroke care quality in Moldova based on the data of the RES-Q registry.
We analyzed the data of all patients with acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke of the RES-Q from 15 Moldovan hospitals. Data were collected for one month each year, during a 3-year period (2017-2019). Data analysis was performed between hospitals according to their access to a brain CT facility for Moldovan participating hospitals. Additionally, Moldovan data were compared with other three ESO-EAST (European Stroke Organization Enhancing and Accelerating Stroke Treatment) project countries: Romania, Lithuania, and Georgia.
A total of 1660 patients were recruited in the study, mean age of 68 years (49% men). Moldova registered poorer results in number of brain CT performed (81% [95% CI 79-84%]), dysphagia screening (29% [95% CI 27-32%]), IV thrombolysis performed (3% [95% CI 2-4%]), administration of anticoagulants (44% [95% CI 39-49%]) and statins (42% [95% CI 39-45%]) at discharge, in-hospital stroke mortality (17% [95% CI 15-19%]). Within Moldova the stroke care quality was driven by the access to CT scan.
Our study highlighted some serious gaps of in-hospital stroke care performance in Moldova, such as the lack of CT scans in many public hospitals, the absence of a national stroke center network, extremely low accessibility of IV thrombolysis and unsatisfactory implementation of secondary stroke prevention treatment.