Adult epilepsy generates a burden that extends beyond seizure counts and includes adverse treatment effects, role restriction, emotional distress, and the social devaluation attached to the diagnosis. The methodological problem is not the absence of patient-reported measures, but the heterogeneity with which disease-specific quality-of-life and stigma instruments are selected, interpreted, and combined in adult studies.
Research ethics and integrity are fundamental for safeguarding human participants and ensuring trustworthy scientific practices. Understanding researchers’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding ethical standards is important for all health researchers, but particularly relevant for early-career researchers. While several international instruments exist to evaluate specific aspects of research ethics, such as plagiarism, organizational climate, or responsible conduct of research, a multidimensional and contextually relevant tool is required.