Skip to main content
MJHS
Navigation
Journal Navigation
Article Navigation
opened article
Volume 12, Issue 3
September 2025
Cover Image

Article contents

opened journal
Volume 12, Issue 3
September 2025
Cover Image

Abstract

Introduction

Stigma surrounding depression continues to be a major barrier to treatment, social inclusion, and recovery. While general attitudes toward mental illness have been widely studied, fewer investigations have focused on the specific beliefs that drive stigma toward individuals with depression in a low- and middle-income country (LMIC) in Eastern European settings, particularly in Moldova.

Material and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 460 participants from Moldova, who completed the Depression Stigma Scale. Each of the nine items reflected a different stigmatizing belief about depression. Descriptive statistics, including mean scores and standard deviations, were calculated for each item. An item-level comparative analysis was performed.

Results

The highest stigma scores were recorded for items such as: “I would not employ someone if I knew they had been depressed”, “Depression is not a real medical illness”, and “Depression is a sign of personal weakness.” The lowest scores were observed for beliefs related to dangerousness and avoidance, including “People with depression are dangerous” and “It is best to avoid people with depression so you don’t become depressed yourself.” These results suggest that stigma in Moldova is predominantly characterized by doubts about the medical legitimacy of depression and concerns over professional roles, rather than fear-based or exclusionary attitudes.

Conclusion

Anti-stigma interventions in LMICs, such as Moldova should prioritize improving public understanding of depression as a legitimate health condition and addressing discrimination in professional settings.

Key Messages

What is not yet known on the issue addressed in the submitted manuscript

While the stigma associated with depression has been widely examined in high-income countries, there is limited evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly in Eastern Europe. Most existing studies in these settings focus on mental illness stigma in general and report aggregated stigma scores, without exploring the specific beliefs that drive stigma toward depression. As a result, the structure, content, and sociodemographic variation of depression-specific stigma remain poorly understood in LMIC contexts.

The research hypothesis

The hypothesis is that, in a low- and middle-income country (LMIC) such as the Republic of Moldova, public stigma toward depression reflects a heterogeneous pattern of beliefs, with certain stigmatizing attitudes more frequently endorsed than others and varying across sociodemographic groups.

The novelty added by manuscript to the already published scientific literature

This study is the first to apply an item-level analysis of the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) in a low- and middle-income country in Eastern Europe. By identifying the most frequently endorsed stigmatizing beliefs and examining their variation by demographic characteristics, the manuscript provides granular, context-specific evidence. These findings go beyond general stigma assessments and contribute directly to the development of targeted anti-stigma strategies adapted to LMICs.

Introduction

Depression is one of the most prevalent mental health conditions globally, with significant personal, social, and economic consequences. According to the World Health Organization, more than 280 million people are affected by depression worldwide, making it a leading cause of disability and a major contributor to the global burden of disease. Despite advances in mental health care and increased awareness, stigma remains a significant barrier to help-seeking, diagnosis, and treatment adherence among individuals with depression [1-3]. 

Stigmatization of depression manifests through negative stereotypes, prejudice, and discriminatory behavior directed at those experiencing the condition. Such beliefs may include the perception that people with depression are weak, unreliable, or dangerous, or that depression is not a real illness but rather a matter of personal will [2]. This stigmatization not only impairs the quality of life of those affected but also contributes to social exclusion, workplace discrimination, and internalized shame or self-stigma.

In Eastern European low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) such as the Republic of Moldova, research on mental health stigma remains limited, particularly in relation to depression. Historical neglect of mental health, limited access to services, and culturally embedded misconceptions contribute to the persistence of stigmatizing beliefs in this region [4, 5]. In Moldova, although reforms in mental health care have been initiated, public attitudes continue to reflect fear, misunderstanding, and reluctance to engage with individuals who suffer from depression.

Existing studies tend to focus on general stigma toward mental illness, often without differentiating between disorders. However, depression-specific stigma may take unique forms, especially regarding perceptions of functionality, employability, or moral character. Identifying which specific beliefs are most prevalent is essential for designing targeted anti-stigma interventions. Item-level analysis of validated instruments such as the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) can provide deeper insights into the patterns of belief within a given population and guide context-sensitive strategies for stigma reduction [2, 6]. 

This article presents the results of an item-level statistical analysis of the DSS applied to a Moldovan sample, aiming to identify the core stigmatizing beliefs about depression in the general population. The findings may inform national efforts and those in similar LMICs regarding public education, workplace inclusion, and mental health policy.

This study aims to identify the core stigmatizing beliefs about depression in the general population of the Republic of Moldova through an item-level statistical analysis of the Depression Stigma Scale.

Material and methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on a convenience sample of 476 adult participants from various regions of the Republic of Moldova. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥18 years, informed consent to participate. Individuals with a known diagnosis of psychotic disorders or cognitive impairment were excluded.

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy (minutes No 44, from 29.05.2024), and all participants provided written informed consent.

To assess stigmatizing beliefs about depression, the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) was used, which contains 9 items measuring the extent of agreement with commonly held stigmatizing beliefs (e.g., “Depression is a sign of personal weakness”, “I would not employ someone if I knew they had been depressed”, “Depression is not a real medical illness”). Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (“strongly disagree”) to 4 (“strongly agree”).

Sociodemographic data were also collected, including age, gender, education, employment status, income, marital status, and urban/rural residence.

Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum) were calculated for each of the 9 DSS items. Item-level analysis was conducted to examine the distribution and intensity of stigma-related beliefs. Results were presented in the form of bar plots for visualization.

Although the analysis focused primarily on descriptive patterns, inferential comparisons between items were also explored to identify statistically significant differences in the endorsement of specific beliefs. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24.0, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 476 individuals participated in this cross-sectional study on stigma toward depression in the Republic of Moldova. The sample included 301 urban residents (63.2%) and 175 rural residents (36.8%), reflecting the geographic distribution of the population and mental health service access. Participants were recruited from 10 administrative units across the country, including both major urban centers (e.g., Chișinău and Bălți) and smaller districts (e.g., Orhei, Călărași, Ialoveni), to ensure diversity in socio-demographic backgrounds.

The sample was composed of 281 women (59%) and 195 men (41%), with ages ranging from 18 to 65 years (mean age = 34.5 years). Educational attainment was distributed as follows: 36.3% (n = 173) had completed 9 years of school, 25.2% (n = 120) had finished 12 years or vocational school, 19.1% (n = 91) had graduated from college, and 10.9% (n = 52) held a university degree. A small proportion, 8.4% (n = 40), reported having completed only primary education.

This stratified sampling approach was designed to ensure representation across key sociodemographic groups relevant to mental health literacy and stigma. It also allowed for later analysis of stigma variation by gender, education, and area of residence.

The Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) was used to assess the level of stigmatizing beliefs toward people with depression. The analysis of item-level responses revealed that the highest agreement rates were observed for the following items: “People with depression could snap out of it if they wanted”, “Depression is a sign of personal weakness”, and “Depression is not a real medical illness”. These beliefs suggest a persistent conceptual stigma, in which depression is perceived as a lack of willpower or not being a genuine illness.

High scores were also recorded for item – “I would not employ someone if I knew they had been depressed”, suggesting occupational stigma and the belief that individuals with depression are unfit for professional roles.

Conversely, the items with the lowest levels of agreement were: “People with depression are dangerous”, “It is best to avoid people with depression so you don’t become depressed yourself”, and “People with depression are unpredictable”, indicating that fear-based and avoidance-related stigma were less prevalent in this sample.

The average score for the item “People with depression could snap out of it if they wanted” was 3.4 (on a 5-point scale), whereas “People with depression are dangerous” had a mean score of just 1.8. This confirms that the dominant stigma in the Moldovan context tends to be conceptual and occupational rather than fear-based or exclusionary.

 

Fig. 1 Mean scores for stigmatizing beliefs about depression

Note: The chart displays the average agreement level (on a 0–4 Likert scale) with each of the nine DSS items, sorted from highest to lowest mean score. Higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the respective stigmatizing belief.

Analysis of stigma variation by gender revealed that men had significantly higher agreement with items suggesting dangerousness and unpredictability. For example, the average score for “People with depression are dangerous” among men was 2.1, compared to 1.6 among women (p < 0.01). 

Educational level also influenced stigma levels. Respondents with only secondary education were more likely to agree with stigmatizing statements such as “Depression is not a real medical illness” (mean score 3.7 vs. 2.9 among those with higher education; p < 0.001).
Urban respondents generally showed lower stigma levels across most items compared to rural respondents, particularly on items relating to avoidance and employment discrimination.
In terms of self-stigma, items “If I had depression I would not tell anyone” and “I would not vote for a politician if I knew they had been depressed” – revealed moderate agreement, suggesting a significant degree of anticipated discrimination and secrecy.

The internal consistency of the scale was high (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.91), confirming the reliability of the instrument in the Moldovan context.

Discussion

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of public attitudes toward depression in a representative sample in the Republic of Moldova, using the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS). The results reveal that stigmatizing beliefs remain prevalent, particularly those that conceptualize depression as a personal weakness or a lack of willpower. The most frequently endorsed items were: “People with depression could snap out of it if they wanted,” “Depression is a sign of personal weakness,” and “Depression is not a real medical illness.” These findings align with prior research highlighting the persistence of conceptual stigma in LMICs, where mental illness is often viewed through a moral or characterological lens rather than a biomedical one [2, 7, 8]. 

Moreover, the relatively high agreement with occupational stigma – such as “I would not employ someone if I knew they had been depressed” – indicates that discriminatory attitudes may translate into tangible social and economic exclusion. This echoes findings from studies conducted in LMICs, including in Eastern Europe, where mental illness is still associated with reduced trust in competence and productivity [3 ,9, 10]. 

Conversely, items reflecting fear-based and avoidance stigma (e.g., “People with depression are dangerous” and “It is best to avoid people with depression”) were less frequently endorsed. This pattern suggests that although respondents may not view individuals with depression as threatening, they still hold beliefs that contribute to marginalization and discrimination, especially in the workforce and public life [9, 11, 12]. 

The analysis also demonstrated statistically significant variations in stigma levels across sociodemographic groups. Male respondents exhibited higher endorsement of beliefs related to dangerousness and unpredictability, consistent with gender-based differences observed in international literature. Educational attainment was inversely associated with stigma, with individuals holding only secondary education more likely to deny the medical legitimacy of depression. Similarly, stigma scores were higher among respondents residing in rural areas, supporting evidence that urban environments may provide greater exposure to mental health information and services [13, 14]. 

Self-stigmatizing attitudes were also evident. Items such as “If I had depression, I would not tell anyone” and “I would not vote for a politician if I knew they had been depressed” revealed moderate levels of internalized stigma and anticipated discrimination. These beliefs are of particular concern, as self-stigma has been shown to negatively impact help-seeking behavior and adherence to treatment [15-17]. 

The internal consistency of the DSS was high (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.91), confirming its reliability for use in the Moldovan context. The item-level analysis allowed for a nuanced understanding of specific stigma domains – conceptual, occupational, fear-based, and self-stigma – highlighting the complex ways in which public perceptions about depression are structured [18]. 

Taken together, these findings underscore the need for adapted anti-stigma interventions in in LMICs, such as Republic of Moldova. Efforts should focus on increasing mental health literacy, challenging harmful stereotypes, and promoting recovery-oriented narratives. Special attention should be given to men, individuals with lower educational attainment, and rural communities, where stigma levels are highest. Public health campaigns, inclusion of mental health education in school curricula, and peer-led awareness initiatives may serve as effective tools for reducing stigma [19-21].

Future research should explore causal pathways through longitudinal designs and assess the effectiveness of anti-stigma programs in LMIC settings. Additionally, qualitative studies may offer deeper insights into the lived experiences of individuals affected by depression and stigma.

Conclusion

This study provides the first item-level analysis of depression stigma in the Republic of Moldova, offering a nuanced understanding of the specific beliefs that sustain stigma in a low- and middle-income country context. The findings reveal that the most strongly endorsed beliefs relate to questioning the medical legitimacy of depression, attributing it to personal weakness, and concerns about the employability of individuals with depression. In contrast, fear-based beliefs, such as the idea that people with depression are dangerous or should be avoided, were less commonly held. These insights represent a valuable contribution to the evidence base needed to design targeted and culturally adapted anti-stigma interventions in LMICs. 

Competing interests

None declared.

Authors’ contribution

 JC conceived the study, led the study design, coordinated the data collection process, and drafted the manuscript. AE contributed to the study design, supervised the analysis, and revised the manuscript critically. IN performed statistical analysis and supported interpretation of the findings. ID and AB participated in data collection and contributed to manuscript preparation. CA and RC assisted with participant recruitment and data entry. MB, MBel, and DJ conducted literature review and formatting. RP contributed to data visualization and statistical validation. All authors reviewed the manuscript critically and approved the final version for publication.

Informed consent for publication

Obtained.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy (minutes No 44, from 29.05.2024).

Acknowledgements and funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge PhD Associate Professor Evelina Gherghelijiu for her essential support in coordinating the research process and managing participant recruitment and data collection. We thank PhD Associate Professor Oleg Arnaut for his contribution to the statistical analysis and validation of the findings. Special appreciation is extended to Dr.P.H. Emily Peca, M.A., Adjunct Faculty at the Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, for her expert guidance throughout the study design and interpretation phases. We also wish to thank Professor Kathleen M. Griffiths, former Director of the National Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, for her foundational role in developing the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS), which served as the core measurement instrument in this study. Finally, we express our deep gratitude to all participants for their openness and contribution to this research. 

This study was realized in the framework of the "Implementation Science Study to investigate community-based mental health interventions for high-risk communities in low- and middle-income countries" HEARD, 2024, financed by USAID

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.

Authors’ ORCID IDs

Jana Chihai – https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7720-5544

Andrei Eșanu – https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1289-4622 

Igor Nastas – https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8751-9101 

Inga Deliv – https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6080-9256 

Alina Bologan – https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1771-7476 

Cornelia Adeola – https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0728-9196 

Radislav Coșulean – https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-6862 

Madalina Bivol – https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2827-9992 

Mihaela Belous – https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2597-1060 

Dorin Jelaga – https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7761-450X 

Romil Popescu – https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6414-7377 

References 

  1. Esanu A, Morais V, Araújo J, Ramos E. Stigma toward people with mental disorders in adolescents: comparison between Portugal and Moldova. Porto Biomed J. 2020;5(6):e089. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000089.

  2. Al-Shannaq Y, Jaradat D, Ta’an WF, Jaradat D. Depression stigma, depression literacy, and psychological help seeking attitudes among school and university students. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2023 Oct;46:98-106.doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2023.08.010.

  3. Pybus K, Pickett KE, Lloyd C, Wilkinson R. The socioeconomic context of stigma: examining the relationship between economic conditions and attitudes towards people with mental illness across European countries. Front Epidemiol. 2023;3:1076188. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1076188.

  4. Thornicroft G, Brohan E, Rose D, Sartorius N, Leese M. Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination against people with schizophrenia: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2009 Jan 31;373(9661):408-15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61817-6.

  5. Rüsch N, Angermeyer MC, Corrigan PW. Mental illness stigma: concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. Eur Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;20(8):529-39. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.04.004.

  6. Corrigan PW, Watson AC. Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;1(1):16-20.

  7. Hansson L, Jormfeldt H, Svedberg P, Svensson B. Mental health professionals’ attitudes towards people with mental illness: do they differ from attitudes held by people with mental illness? Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;59(1):48-54. doi: 10.1177/0020764011423176.

  8. Griffiths KM, Christensen H, Jorm AF. Predictors of depression stigma. BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Apr 18;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-25. 

  9. Mak WWS, Poon CYM, Pun LYK, Cheung SF. Meta-analysis of stigma and mental health. Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jul;65(2):245-61.doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.015.

  10. Pescosolido BA, Medina TR, Martin JK, Long JS. The “backbone” of stigma: identifying the global core of public prejudice associated with mental illness. Am J Public Health. 2013 May;103(5):853-60. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301147.

  11. Lasalvia A, Zoppei S, Van Bortel T, Bonetto C, Cristofalo D, Wahlbeck K, et al. Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2013 Nov 9;381(9860):55-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61379-8.

  12. Schomerus G, Schwahn C, Holzinger A, Corrigan PW, Grabe HJ, Carta MG, et al. Evolution of public attitudes about mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012 Jun;125(6):440-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01826.x.

  13. Rüsch N, Müller M, Ajdacic-Gross V, Rodgers S, Corrigan PW, Rössler W. Shame, perceived knowledge and satisfaction associated with mental health as predictors of attitude patterns towards help-seeking. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2014 Jun;23(2):177-87. doi: 10.1017/S204579601300036X.

  14. Evans-Lacko S, Brohan E, Mojtabai R, Thornicroft G. Association between public views of mental illness and self-stigma among individuals with mental illness in 14 European countries. Psychol Med. 2012 Jan;42(8):1741-52. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002558.

  15. Dinos S, Stevens S, Serfaty M, Weich S, King M. Stigma: the feelings and experiences of 46 people with mental illness. Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;184:176-81. doi: 10.1192/bjp.184.2.176.

  16. Reavley NJ, Jorm AF. Public recognition of mental disorders and beliefs about treatment: changes in Australia over 16 years. Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;200(5):419-25. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.104208.

  17. Livingston JD, Boyd JE. Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Dec;71(12):2150–61.doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.030.

  18. Esanu A, Chihai J. Stigmatizarea persoanelor cu depresie [Stigma towards people with depression]. Stud Univ Mold (Educ Sci Ser). 2018;(9):41-44. Romanian.

  19. Wasserman D, Apter G, Baeken C, Bailey S, Balazs J, Bec C, et al. Compulsory admissions of patients with mental disorders: State of the art on ethical and legislative aspects in 40 European countries. Eur Psychiatry. 2020;63(1):e82. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.79.

  20. Chihai J, Spinei L, Cerniţanu M, Garaz G, Eşanu A, Bologan A. Probleme psihosociale determinate de pandemia COVID-19 = Psychosocial problems caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Mold J Health Sci. 2020;(2):161-169. Romanian, English. 

  21. Harhaji S, Tomori S, Nakov V, Chihai J, Radić I, Mana T, Stoychev K, Esanu A, Pirlog MC. Stigmatising attitudes towards mental health conditions among medical students in five South-Eastern European countries. Zdr Varst. 2024 Sep 23;63(4):188-197. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0025. 

More articles

Research The Tirone David procedure in acute type A aortic dissection – when, how, and why? The experience of Professor Dr. George I.M. Georgescu Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases
Grigore Tinică1,2,3, Mihail Enache1,2, Andrei Țărus1,2, Silviu Stoleriu1,2, Alberto Bacușcă1,2
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.01
Acute type A aortic dissection represents a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency with catastrophic natural history and extremely high mortality in the absence of prompt surgical intervention. Over the last decades, surgical management has evolved from supracoronary replacement and composite root replacement (Bentall procedure) towards valve-sparing strategies, among which the Tirone David reimplantation procedure has gained increasing acceptance.
Research Development of the facial nerve and its specific features
Angela Babuci1*, Zinovia Zorina1, Ilia Catereniuc1, Nataliya Trushel2, Anastasia Bendelic1, Nadia Ostahi1, Sofia Lehtman3
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.02
The data reported in the specialty literature on the embryogenesis of the facial nerve mainly refer to the initial stages of its development. Nevertheless, the intrauterine development of the facial nerve is a complex and insightful process, characterized by a range of peculiarities. The goal of our study was to highlight the specific developmental features of the facial nerve for a better understanding of its morphology in adults
Research Variants of the common carotid artery branching patterns
Nadia Ostahi*, Angela Babuci, Ilia Catereniuc, Anastasia Bendelic, Zinovia Zorina
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.03
The common carotid artery is the main source of blood supply to the head and neck regions. Its branching patterns are of great interest in terms of both anatomical and clinical significance. Variability of the common carotid artery can influence the planning of vascular, endovascular and oncological interventions in the head and neck regions, to avoid vessel injuries as well as intra-operative and postoperative complications.
Research Diastolic dysfunction and myocardial ischemia in TAVI patients
Marcel Abraș1,2*, Ecaterina Pasat2, Maria-Magdalena Vicol2, Cătălina Ciorici1, Daniela Bursacovschi2
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.04
Severe aortic stenosis and ischemic coronary artery disease are frequently associated in elderly patients, adding complexity to interventional management. Diastolic dysfunction, a marker of myocardial impairment and elevated filling pressures, may influence prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in the presence of concomitant coronary pathology. The aim of the study was to analyze the interaction between severe aortic valve stenosis, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, and coronary ischemia in elderly patients with complex cardiovascular disease.
Research Hiatal surface area measurement – a useful tool during laparoscopic antireflux surgery
Serghei Cumpătă1*, Vasile Guzun2, Vladimir Iacub1, Evghenii Guțu1
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.05
Accurate measurement of the esophageal hiatus is essential during laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia, especially in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Traditional intraoperative assessments are often subjective and inconsistent. This study proposes a novel, objective method for measuring the hiatal surface area using digital photography and open-source image analysis software.
Research Targeting the biochemical signature of age-related macular degeneration: a preliminary study of potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers
Ecaterina Pavlovschi*, Angela Untila, Svetlana Protopop, Ala Ambros, Olga Tagadiuc
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.07
Age-related macular degeneration is a multifactorial, polyetiological condition, affecting individuals over the age of 50, primarily characterized by progressive and irreversible loss of central vision. In the pursuit of a deeper understanding of its etiopathogenesis, risk factors, associated biomarkers, and diagnostic metabolites, the omics approach plays an essential role. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate selected omics biomarkers along with hematological and clinical data and to establish their correlations with macular degeneration.
Research Community-acquired pneumonia in chronic heart failure: approach through the oxidative stress and systemic inflammation
Virginia Cascaval1*, Tatiana Dumitras1, Diana Fetco-Mereuta1, Sergiu Matcovschi1, Livi Grib2
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.08
Diagnosing community-acquired pneumonia in patients with chronic heart failure can be challenging. Oxidative stress and inflammatory response play an important role in the development and diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia and are also involved in many cardiovascular diseases, including chronic heart failure.
Research Natural course of inflammatory cardiomyopathies
Andrei Braniște1, Vladimir Naumov2, Valeriu Cobeț1, Tudor Braniște3*
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.10
Refractory heart failure with a poor prognosis is a key feature of dilated cardiomyopathy. Inflammatory cardiomyopathy, often diagnosed via in vivo subendomyocardial biopsy, is considered a potential precursor to dilated cardiomyopathy. The Dallas criteria, applied to morphometric and electron microscopic studies of biopsy samples, are essential for differentiating the features of various inflammatory stages. Building upon these established diagnostic principles, our study integrates immunohistological analysis with measurements of intramyocardial indices and intracardiac hemodynamics.
Research Lipid profile in young people
Diana Chiosa1*, Rodica Ignat1, Alexei Levițchi2, Ghenadie Curocichin1,2
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.11
Metabolic risk factors for non-communicable chronic diseases develop from an early age, while the clinical manifestations of cardiovascular diseases associated with these risk factors appear later in life. Dyslipidemia is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the lipid profile in young people as an early risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
Research Sarcopenia and frailty: risk profiles in patients with chronic heart failure
Anastasia Ivanes1*, Lucia Mazur-Nicorici1, Virginia Șalaru2, Livi Grib1, Snejana Vetrilă1
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.13
Patients with heart failure frequently present with varying degrees of skeletal muscle dysfunction, from early fatigue to sarcopenia and cachexia. Sarcopenia, defined as the loss of muscle mass and/or function, contributes to the physical dimension of frailty. Both conditions are associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure.
Research Osteocalcin and metabolic dysfunction in young women with obesity
Carolina Piterschi1,2 ⃰, Lorina Vudu1,2
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.14
Osteocalcin, a bone-derived hormone, has emerged as a potential regulator of energy metabolism, with roles in insulin sensitivity, glucose homeostasis, and lipid metabolism. Although an inverse association between osteocalcin and body mass index has been previously reported, data on its link with metabolic parameters in young, otherwise healthy women with obesity remain limited.
Research Targeting redox balance: antioxidant effects of thiosemicarbazones on human peripheral blood
Valeriana Pantea1, Ecaterina Pavlovschi1,2*, Silvia Stratulat2, Aurelian Gulea3, Olga Tagadiuc2, Valentin Gudumac1
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.16
Thiosemicarbazones represent a class of organic compounds with well-documented pharmacological properties, including antitumor, antimicrobial, and antiviral activities. Contemporary research highlights their role in modulating cellular redox equilibrium through antioxidant pathway regulation.
Research The effectiveness of using a checklist in prehospital stroke interventions in the Republic of Moldova
Natalia Catanoi1,2, Mihail Peștereanu1*, Larisa Rezneac1,2, Natalia Mocanu1
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.17
Stroke remains a major cause of mortality and disability in Moldova and globally. Rapid prehospital intervention is critical for improving outcomes. The adoption of standardized protocols and checklists has enhanced the efficiency of emergency medical services (EMS), especially in stroke recognition and initial management.
Research Comparative assessment of active compounds in Solidago species from the flora of the Republic of Moldova
Cornelia Fursenco1,2*, Violeta Alexandra Ion3, Tatiana Calalb1,2, Livia Uncu2,
https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2025.3.20
Solidago virgaurea (European goldenrod) and Solidago canadensis (Canadian goldenrod) are two plant species that have been extensively investigated for their complex phytochemical profiles, particularly represented by flavonoids, phenolic acids, saponins, and essential oils with notable antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.